2018 State Focus Visit

Home > State Specific Requirements > Model Preservice Student Teaching Experience

Model Preservice Student Teaching Experience

Web Links:

Abbreviations:

Student Teacher/Teaching (ST)

Cooperating Teacher (CT)

University Supervisor (US)

Evidence	Elements Met	Rationale
1. Cooperating Teacher Survey	1a, 1b	1a: Teacher reports their certification area 1b: Teacher reports years of teaching experience
2. Placement Request and Verification email	1c, 1e	1c: Includes question about principal’s recommendation for effective professional practice & dispositions 1e: Co-selected with principal who confirms the teacher is prepared to act as a CT
3. End of Semester Evaluation	1e, 1f	1f: Evaluation confirms the mentor teacher receives positive evaluations from ST candidate & EPP supervisor 1e: Positive evaluations ensure CT is retained
4. Field Experience Coordinator Visit	1e	1e: Field Experience Coordinator visits CT each semester to ensure the CT is supported
5. Idaho SDE Certification Lookup	1a, 1b	1a, 1b: CT is confirmed to have three years of teaching area in the content area
6. Cooperating Teacher Contract	1d	1d: Field Experience Coordinator is working with ISU Office of General Council to develop contracts for CTs where they will sign off on their commitment to mentor, co-plan, co-assess, and co-teach with student teacher

Evidence	Elements Met	Rationale
EPP Supervisor Survey	2a	EPP Supervisor reports P-12 education certified field experience
Rater Reliability Training (under development)	2b	Field Experience Office will host annual rater reliability training for all EPP supervisors
EPP Supervisor evaluation by CT	2c, 2d	EPP supervisor receives positive school evaluations from CT and evidence of dispositions of a professional educator
EPP Supervisor evaluation by Student Teacher	2c, 2d	EPP supervisor receives positive school evaluations from ST and evidence of dispositions of a professional educator

Evidence	Elements Met	Rationale
Field Experience Coordinator Visit (Make notes in Taskstream?)	3a	3a: Field Experience Coordinator visits CT and ST each semester to ensure the CT is being supported by the P-12 school and EPP Partnership
Partnership Schools Meeting Agenda	3b	Meetings support the conceptual framework and partnership goals
Partnership Schools End-of-Year Report	3a, 3b	Report documents supports and partnership
ISU Partnership Schools Principal Survey	3b	Survey demonstrates input from the partner principals

Evidence	Elements Met	Rationale
Field Experience Report	4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e	Meets these indicators because as candidates move through the three programmatic Gateways, there is an overall view of coursework and benchmarks that must be completed before being allowed to move forward.
Taskstream or Filemaker (Need to put this into database?)	4a	EPP confirms with State Department that Background Check has cleared

Evidence	Elements Met	Rationale
Field Experience Report	5a, 5b, 5c, 5e, 5f, 5h	Meets these indicators because as candidates move through the three programmatic Gateways, there is an overall view of coursework and benchmarks that must be completed before being allowed to move forward.
Taskstream Database	5a, 5b, 5c, 5d	The following artifacts are uploaded into Taskstream 5a: At least three observations by EPP Supervisor 5b: At least three observations by the CT 5c & 5f: CSA/IPLP Reports 5d: Assessment on student growth 5e: Candidate Portfolio
Impact on P-12 Learning and Development (CAEP Annual Reporting Measures 4.1)	5d	Candidates’ evidence of their impact on P12 learning (see report)

Author: ISU College of Education Manager
Last modified: 11/11/2018 9:42 AM (EDT)