Block II – Internship I
Service Learning Assignment
Description:
A key field component of Internship I is the Service Learning Project. This project will be planned, and if possible, implemented and assessed during your internship. The specifics for this project are:
*** The scoring instruments for the lesson plan (checklist) and the seven questions (rubric) – are on the following pages.
*** Scoring: Lesson Plan: 18 points
Seven Questions: 42 points
Total : 60 points
Passing grade = minimum of 42 points = 70%
***You will need to pass this project in order to pass ELED 494***
STANDARDS
National (AECI)
Development, Learning, and Motivation:
Candidates, know, understand, and use the major concepts, principles, theories, and research related to development of children and young adolescents to construct learning opportunities that support individuals’ development, acquisition of knowledge, and motivation.
Instruction:
3.1 – Integrating and applying knowledge for instruction
3.2 – Adaptation to diverse students
3.3 – Development of critical thinking, problem-solving, performance skills
3.4 – Active engagement in learning
3.5 – Communication to foster collaboration
FSU Conceptual Framework
Collaborative Bridge-Builder
1: Promotes cooperative learning opportunities
2: Links subject matter within and across disciplines and grade/school levels
3: Builds effective school/home/community partnerships
4: Creates powerful learning communities within and beyond the classrooms and school
5: Treats students and members of the educational community equitably and respectfully
Block II – Internship I
Service Learning
Reflections Questions
After completing your Service Learning Project, answer each of the following questions and place them on TaskStream.
|
Target (6) |
Acceptable (4) |
Unacceptable (2) |
Your Score |
1. Integrated Learning |
Project has clearly articulated knowledge and/or skill goals that arise from broader classroom content standards |
Knowledge and/or skill goals are indicated and connected to the content standards |
No indication of either knowledge or skill goals and connection to content standards is vague or non-existent |
|
2. High Quality Service |
The service responds to an actual environmental community need that is recognized by the community and is age-appropriate and well-organized |
Service responds to an actual environmental need, is age-appropriate, but the community recognition and/or organization is not clearly indicated |
Service is not an actual environmental need, is not age-appropriate, and lacks appropriate organization |
|
3. Collaboration |
Service is collaborative among at least five (5) of the following partners – students, parents, teacher(s), intern, community-based organization, administrators, and recipients of the service |
Service indicates collaboration among four (4) of the suggested partners |
Service indicates collaboration among three (3) or fewer of the suggested partners |
|
4. Student Voice |
Students participate actively in the choice, plan, implementation, evaluation and celebration of the service project |
Students have a limited role in the choice, plan, implementation, evaluation and celebration of the service project |
Students have a vague or non-existent role in one or more of the following: choice, plan, implementation, evaluation and celebration of the service project |
|
5. Civic Responsibility |
Service clearly promotes students’ responsibility to care for the environment – physical and/or human |
Students’ responsibility to care for the environment – physical and/or human – is not clearly evident |
No evidence of the project promoting students’ responsibility to care for the environment |
|
6. Reflection |
Reflection, before, during, and after service, establishes a clear connection between the service project and academic curriculum |
Evidence of reflection, before, during, and after service that establishes a connection between the service project and academic curriculum is not clear |
Reflection, before, during, and after service is not evident and no connection between the service project and academic curriculum is found |
|
7. Evaluation |
All partners, especially students, are involved in evaluating the project |
Not all of the four (4) partners are involved in evaluating the project |
One of the key partners – intern, cooperating teacher, or students, are not involved in evaluating the project |
|
Service Learning: Lesson Plan Checklist
Intern:
Score:
Requirement |
Met (3 pts) |
Not Met (0 pts) |
Overview of Service Learning Project provided on Lesson Plan |
|
|
Lesson Plan format followed
|
|
|
Activities for 5 Days provided
|
|
|
1st Day – Dealing with Prior Knowledge
|
|
|
Reflection for each day
|
|
|
Mentor Teacher’s Evaluation provided
|
|
|