Louisiana State University and A&M College

  1. Home
  2. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
  3. PART 1. Signatures Attesting to Compliance
  4. PART 2. List of Substantive Changes Approved Since the Last Reaffirmation
  5. PART 3. Institutional Assessment of Compliance
    1. Section 2: Core Requirements
      1. 2.1 Degree-granting Authority
      2. 2.2 Governing Board
      3. 2.3 Chief Executive Officer
      4. 2.4 Institutional Mission
      5. 2.5 Institutional Effectiveness
        1. 2.5 Institutional Effectiveness (Continued)
      6. 2.6 Continuous Operation
      7. 2.7.1 Program Length
        1. 2.7.1 Program Length (Continued)
      8. 2.7.2 Program Content
      9. 2.7.3 General Education
      10. 2.7.4 Course work for Degrees
      11. 2.8 Faculty
      12. 2.9 Learning Resources and Services
      13. 2.10 Student Support Services
        1. 2.10 Student Support Services (Continued)
      14. 2.11.1 Financial Resources
      15. 2.11.2 Physical Resources
    2. Section 3: Comprehensive Standards
      1. 3.1.1 Mission
      2. 3.2.1 CEO evaluation/selection
      3. 3.2.2 Governing board control
      4. 3.2.3 Board conflict of interest
      5. 3.2.4 External Influence
      6. 3.2.5 Board dismissal
      7. 3.2.6 Board/administration distinction
      8. 3.2.7 Organizational structure
      9. 3.2.8 Qualified administrative/academic officers
      10. 3.2.9 Personnel appointment
      11. 3.2.10 Administrative staff evaluations
      12. 3.2.11 Control of intercollegiate athletics
      13. 3.2.12 Fund-raising activities
      14. 3.2.13 Institution-related entities
      15. 3.2.14 Intellectual property rights
      16. 3.3.1 Institutional Effectiveness
        1. 3.3.1.1
          1. 3.3.1.1 (Continued)
        2. 3.3.1.2
        3. 3.3.1.3
          1. 3.3.1.3 (Continued)
        4. 3.3.1.4
          1. 3.3.1.4 (Continued)
        5. 3.3.1.5
          1. 3.3.1.5 (Continued)
      17. 3.4.1 Academic program approval
      18. 3.4.2 Continuing education/service programs
      19. 3.4.3 Admissions policies
      20. 3.4.4 Acceptance of academic credit
      21. 3.4.5 Academic policies
      22. 3.4.6 Practices for awarding credit
      23. 3.4.7 Consortial relationships/contractual agreements
      24. 3.4.8 Noncredit to credit
      25. 3.4.9 Academic support services
        1. 3.4.9 (Continued)
        2. 3.4.9 (Continued - 2)
      26. 3.4.10 Responsibility for curriculum
      27. 3.4.11 Academic program coordination
      28. 3.4.12 Technology use
      29. 3.5.1 General education competencies
      30. 3.5.2 Institutional credits for a degree
      31. 3.5.3 Undergraduate program requirements
      32. 3.5.4 Terminal degrees of faculty
      33. 3.6.1 Post-baccalaureate program rigor
        1. 3.6.1 Post-baccalaureate program rigor (Continued)
      34. 3.6.2 Graduate curriculum
      35. 3.6.3 Institutional credits for a graduate degree
      36. 3.6.4 Post-baccalaureate program requirements
      37. 3.7.1 Faculty competence
      38. 3.7.2 Faculty evaluation
      39. 3.7.3 Faculty development
      40. 3.7.4 Academic freedom
      41. 3.7.5 Faculty role in governance
      42. 3.8.1 Learning/information resources
      43. 3.8.2 Instruction of library use
      44. 3.8.3 Qualified staff
      45. 3.9.1 Student rights
      46. 3.9.2 Student records
      47. 3.9.3 Qualified staff
      48. 3.10.1 Financial Stability
      49. 3.10.2 Financial aid audits
      50. 3.10.3 Control of finances
      51. 3.10.4 Control of sponsored research/external funds
      52. 3.11.1 Control of physical resources
      53. 3.11.2 Institutional environment
      54. 3.11.3 Physical facilities
      55. 3.12.1 Substantive change
      56. 3.13 Policy compliance
        1. 3.13.1 "Accrediting Decisions of Other Agencies"
        2. 3.13.2. "Collaborative Academic Arrangements: Policy and Procedures"
        3. 3.13.3. "Complaint Procedures Against the Commission or Its Accredited Institutions"
        4. 3.13.4. "Reaffirmation of Accreditation and Subsequent Reports"
          1. 3.13.4.a.
          2. 3.13.4.b.
      57. 3.14.1 Publication of accreditation status
      58. 3.13.5. "Separate Accreditation for Units of a Member Institution"
        1. 3.13.5.a.
        2. 3.13.5.b.
    3. Section 4: Federal Requirements
      1. 4.1 Student Achievement
      2. 4.2 Program curriculum
        1. 4.2 Program curriculum (Continued)
      3. 4.3 Publication of policies
      4. 4.4 Program length
        1. 4.4 Program length (Continued)
      5. 4.5 Student complaints
      6. 4.6 Recruitment materials
      7. 4.7 Title IV program responsibilities
      8. 4.8 Distance and correspondence education
        1. 4.8.1
        2. 4.8.2
        3. 4.8.3
      9. 4.9 Definition of credit hours
  6. PART 4. Institutional Summary Form Prepared for Commission Reviews
  7. FOCUSED REPORT
  8. QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN (QEP)
Home > PART 3. Institutional Assessment of Compliance > Section 3: Comprehensive Standards > 3.2.10 Administrative staff evaluations

3.2.10 Administrative staff evaluations

The institution periodically evaluates the effectiveness of its administrators. (Administrative staff evaluations)

Compliance Status

Louisiana State University and A&M College is in compliance with this principle.

Narrative

Similar to the faculty members at Louisiana State University and A&M College (LSU), administrators [1] undergo an annual review process [2] [3].  The review process is described in policy statements PS-35 Performance Evaluation of Administrative, Professional, and Other Academic Staff [2] and PS-111 Consultation with Faculty in Certain Reviews of Administrative Performance [3]. In each case, the reviewing officer is the administrator's primary supervisor.   Certain academic administrator performance evaluations, however, require input from the faculty of the unit [4].  According to PS-111, a systematic consultation and communication between the reviewing officer and the faculty in the academic unit must occur at least every other year for the review process of certain academic positions.  This consultation often is conducted by the use of a survey instrument [2].  The reporting officer reports back to the faculty of the unit on the evaluation, including a summary of the results of observations and opinions of the faculty that have been collected. The review results in a written report, including the reviewing officer’s evaluation of the administrator’s job performance, based on job responsibility. The report is signed by the reviewing officer and by the administrator being evaluated; it is then placed on record in the administrator’s file, which is subject to the confidentiality requirements of PS-40 [5].

Key Administrative Leadership Positions

President and Chancellor: The president and chancellor is the chief executive officer of the university and exercises complete executive authority therein, subject to the direction and control of the LSU Board of Supervisors.  Additional information on the CEO evaluation process is presented in the compliance certificate for Comprehensive Standard 3.2.1.

Executive Vice Chancellor & Provost: The executive vice chancellor and provost is the chief operating officer and the chief academic officer of the university.  He/she acts as chief administrative officer in the absence of the president and chancellor.  The executive vice chancellor and provost represents the Office of the President and Chancellor on both internal and external matters.  The executive vice chancellor and provost is reviewed annually by the president and chancellor.  The annual evaluation typically addresses accomplishments over the previous fiscal year, future goals, and how these work toward the university’s strategic plan.

Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administrative Services and Chief Financial Officer: The vice chancellor for finance and administrative services reports directly to the president and chancellor and is annually evaluated for satisfactory performance by the chancellor.

Vice Chancellors: Three vice chancellors report to the executive vice chancellor and provost and oversee specific university functions: vice chancellor for Research and Economic Development, vice chancellor for Student Life and Enrollment Services, and the vice chancellor for Strategic Initiatives. The vice chancellors serve in the vice chancellor cabinet and also meet with the executive vice chancellor and provost normally on a monthly basis. The executive vice chancellor and provost conducts annual evaluations of the vice chancellors.

Vice Provosts: The university has four vice provosts that reside in the Office of Academic Affairs and report directly to the executive vice chancellor and provost: vice provost for Academic Affairs (Academic Programs, Planning & Review), vice provost for Academic Affairs (Human Resources & Facilities Management), vice provost for Equity, Diversity & Community Outreach, and vice provost for Fiscal Management.  The executive vice chancellor and provost conducts annual evaluations on the vice provosts.  In addition, the executive vice chancellor and provost meets regularly with the vice provosts, normally weekly.

Deans: Academic deans are responsible to the chancellor through the executive vice chancellor and provost. They are the chief executive officers of their respective colleges or schools and hold office at the pleasure of the LSU Board of Supervisors. They are responsible for all aspects of academic life within their colleges, including budgets, teaching, research, and personnel matters involving faculty, staff, and students. The executive vice chancellor and provost conducts annual evaluations of the deans but also meets on a regular, ongoing basis to assess performance. At least every other year, the review process includes a systematic consultation and communication between the reviewing officer and the faculty in the academic unit, per PS-111 [3]. 

Department Chairs/Heads: Department chairs or heads are the executive officers of the academic departments. They are responsible to the chancellor through the appropriate dean and the executive vice chancellor and provost and hold office at the pleasure of the LSU Board of Supervisors.  The department chairs/heads are reviewed annually by the reviewing officer, typically the dean of the academic unit.  At least every other year, the review process normally includes a systematic consultation and communication between the reviewing officer and the faculty in the academic unit, per PS-111 [3]. 

Example of Annual Evaluations

To illustrate the application of the evaluation process on administrative staff, a series of recent evaluations of a dean of a college for three consecutive years is attached [6].

Author: Stephenie Franks
Last modified: 7/1/2015 8:33 AM (EDT)