As one who desires to be a school administrator capable of leading sustainable educational change, examining the work of turnaround principals made sense. They are expected to perform under the worst conditions, and I thought that learning from their successes would assist me when working under more desirable circumstances.
However, I’ve now come to the conclusion that the requirements for successful and sustainable change are the same, regardless of the setting. Whether it is leading change in low-performing or high-performing schools, or in urban or rural communities, the same plan of action can be applied.
The decisions and changes school leaders make should include the basic components of pursuing a precise and shared objective, building the capacity of faculty and staff, analyzing data, communicating with stakeholders, and monitoring the effects of the current efforts in place.
Examining the work of successful turnaround principals is helpful, though, when facing opposition. The important characteristics they need to tackle the challenges of low-performing, troubled schools include:
My research on successful turnaround initiatives led me to create a plan of action that I believe to be successful for leading sustainable change in schools.
The plan of action proposed here is necessarily generic because, in order to be effective, it would have to be modified to approach the challenges of a particular school.
Phase 1: Initiation
Phase 2: Implementation
Phase 3: Continuation and Sustainability
If you take the time to look at the attached presentation, you will find that my plan of action for an education leader differs only slightly to that which I outlined as a business management consultant for the deployment of a new program in other types of organizations.