CSUSB WASC Reaccreditation Process

Home > WASC Standards & Criteria for Review > Standard 2: Achieving Educational Objectives through Core Functions

Standard 2: Achieving Educational Objectives through Core Functions

The institution achieves its institutional purposes and attains its educational objectives through the core functions of teaching and learning, scholarship and creative activity, and support for student learning and success. It demonstrates that these core functions are performed effectively and that they support one another in the institution’s efforts to attain educational effectiveness.

Criteria for Review 2.1

Teaching and Learning

The institution’s educational programs are appropriate in content, standards, and nomenclature for the degree level awarded, regardless of mode of delivery, and are staffed by sufficient numbers of faculty qualified for the type and level of curriculum offered.

Criteria for Review 2.2

Teaching and Learning

All degrees—undergraduate and graduate—awarded by the institution are clearly defined in terms of entrylevel requirements and in terms of levels of student achievement necessary for graduation that represent more than simply an accumulation of courses or credits.

Criteria for Review 2.2a

Teaching and Learning

Baccalaureate programs engage students in an integrated course of study of sufficient breadth and depth to prepare them for work, citizenship, and a fulfilling life. These programs also ensure the development of core learning abilities and competencies including, but not limited to, collegelevel written and oral communication; college-level quantitative skills; information literacy; and the habit of critical analysis of data and argument. In addition, baccalaureate programs actively foster an understanding of diversity; civic responsibility; the ability to work with others; and the capability to engage in lifelong learning. Baccalaureate programs also ensure breadth for all students in the areas of cultural and aesthetic, social and political, as well as scientific and technical knowledge expected of educated persons in this society. Finally, students are required to engage in an in-depth, focused, and sustained program of study as part of their baccalaureate programs.

Criteria for Review 2.2.b

Teaching and Learning

Graduate programs are consistent with the purpose and character of their institutions; are in keeping with the expectations of their respective disciplines and professions; and are described through nomenclature that is appropriate to the several levels of graduate and professional degrees offered. Graduate curricula are visibly structured to include active involvement with the literature of the field and ongoing student engagement in research and/or appropriate high-level professional practice and training experiences. Additionally, admission criteria to graduate programs normally include a baccalaureate degree in an appropriate undergraduate program.

Criteria for Review 2.3

Teaching and Learning

The institution’s student learning outcomes and expectations for student attainment are clearly stated at the course, program and, as appropriate, institutional level. These outcomes and expectations are reflected in academic programs and policies; curriculum; advisement; library and information resources; and the wider learning environment.

Criteria for Review 2.4

Teaching and Learning

The institution’s expectations for learning and student attainment are developed and widely shared among its members (including faculty, students, staff, and where appropriate, external stakeholders). The institution’s faculty takes collective responsibility for establishing, reviewing, fostering, and demonstrating the attainment of these expectations.

Criteria for Review 2.5

Teaching and Learning

The institution’s academic programs actively involve students in learning, challenge them to meet high expectations, and provide them with appropriate and ongoing feedback about their performance and how it can be improved.

Criteria for Review 2.6

Teaching and Learning

The institution demonstrates that its graduates consistently achieve its stated levels of attainment and ensures that its expectations for student learning are embedded in the standards faculty use to evaluate student work.

Criteria for Review 2.7

Teaching and Learning

All programs offered by the institution are subject to systematic program review. The program review process includes analyses of the achievement of the program’s learning objectives and outcomes, program retention and completion, and, where appropriate, results of licensing examination and placement and evidence from external constituencies such as employers and professional organizations.

Criteria for Review 2.8

Scholarship and Creative Activity

The institution actively values and promotes scholarship, creative activity, and curricular and instructional innovation, as well as their dissemination at levels and of the kinds appropriate to the institution’s purposes and character.

Criteria for Review 2.9

Scholarship and Creative Activity

The institution recognizes and promotes appropriate linkages among scholarship, teaching, student learning and service.

Criteria for Review 2.10

Support for Student Learning and Success

The institution collects and analyzes student data disaggregated by demographic categories and areas of study. It tracks achievement, satisfaction, and campus climate to support student success. The institution regularly identifies the characteristics of its students and assesses their preparation, needs, and experiences.

Criteria for Review 2.11

Support for Student Learning and Success

Consistent with its purposes, the institution develops and assesses its co-curricular programs.

Criteria for Review 2.12

Support for Student Learning and Success

The institution ensures that all students understand the requirements of their academic programs and receive timely, useful, and regular information and advising about relevant academic requirements.

Criteria for Review 2.13

Support for Student Learning and Success

Student support services—including financial aid, registration, advising, career counseling, computer labs, and library and information services—are designed to meet the needs of the specific types of students the institution serves and the curricula it offers.

Criteria for Review 2.14

Support for Student Learning and Success

Institutions that serve transfer students assume an obligation to provide clear and accurate information about transfer requirements, ensure equitable treatment for such students with respect to academic policies, and ensure that such students are not unduly disadvantaged by transfer requirements.

Author: CSUSB Manager
Last modified: 9/29/2014 8:49 AM (EDT)