CSUSB WASC Reaccreditation Process

Home > WASC Standards & Criteria for Review > Standard 3: Developing and Applying Resources and Organizational Structures to Ensure Sustainability

Standard 3: Developing and Applying Resources and Organizational Structures to Ensure Sustainability

The institution sustains its operations and supports the achievement of its educational objectives through its investment in human, physical, fiscal, and information resources and through an appropriate and effective set of organizational and decision-making structures. These key resources and organizational structures promote the achievement of institutional purposes and educational objectives and create a high quality environment for learning.

Criteria for Review 3.1

Faculty and Staff

The institution employs personnel sufficient in number and professional qualifications to maintain its operations and to support its academic programs, consistent with its institutional and educational objectives.

Criteria for Review 3.2

Faculty and Staff

The institution demonstrates that it employs a faculty with substantial and continuing commitment to the institution sufficient in number, professional qualifications, and diversity to achieve its educational objectives, to establish and oversee academic policies, and to ensure the integrity and continuity of its academic programs wherever and however delivered.

Criteria for Review 3.3

Faculty and Staff

Faculty and staff recruitment, orientation, workload, incentive, and evaluation practices are aligned with institutional purposes and educational objectives. Evaluation processes are systematic, include appropriate peer review, and, for instructional faculty and other teaching staff, involve consideration of evidence of teaching effectiveness, including student evaluations of instruction.

Criteria for Review 3.4

Faculty and Staff

The institution maintains appropriate and sufficiently supported faculty and staff development activities designed to improve teaching and learning, consistent with its institutional objectives.

Criteria for Review 3.5

Fiscal, Physical, and Information Resources

The institution has a history of financial stability, unqualified independent financial audits and has resources sufficient to ensure long-term viability. Resources are aligned with educational purposes and objectives. If an institution has an accumulated deficit, it has realistic plans to eliminate the deficit. Resource planning and development include realistic budgeting, enrollment management, and diversification of revenue sources.

Criteria for Review 3.6

Fiscal, Physical, and Information Resources

The institution holds, or provides access to, information resources sufficient in scope, quality, currency, and kind to support its academic offerings and the scholarship of its members. These information resources, services and facilities are consistent with the institution’s educational objectives and are aligned with student learning outcomes. For both on-campus students and students enrolled at a distance, physical and information resources, services, and information technology facilities are sufficient in scope and kind to support and maintain the level and kind of education offered.

Criteria for Review 3.7

Fiscal, Physical, and Information Resources

The institution’s information technology resources are sufficiently coordinated and supported to fulfill its educational purposes and to provide key academic and administrative functions.

Criteria for Review 3.8

Organizational Structures and Decision-Making Processes

The institution’s organizational structures and decisionmaking processes are clear and consistent with its purposes, support effective decision making, and place priority on sustaining effective academic programs.

Criteria for Review 3.9

Organizational Structures and Decision-Making Processes

The institution has an independent governing board or similar authority that, consistent with its legal and fiduciary authority, exercises appropriate oversight over institutional integrity, policies, and ongoing operations, including hiring and evaluating the chief executive officer.

Criteria for Review 3.10

Organizational Structures and Decision-Making Processes

The institution has a full-time chief executive officer and a chief financial officer whose primary or fulltime responsibility is to the institution. In addition, the institution has a sufficient number of other qualified administrators to provide effective educational leadership and management.

Crtieria for Review 3.11

Organizational Structures and Decision-Making Processes

The institution’s faculty exercises effective academic leadership and acts consistently to ensure both academic quality and the appropriate maintenance of the institution’s educational purposes and character.

Author: CSUSB Manager
Last modified: 9/29/2014 8:49 AM (EDT)